You have 1 article left to read this month before you need to register a free LeadDev.com account.
Your inbox, upgraded.
Receive weekly engineering insights to level up your leadership approach.
Estimated reading time: 7 minutes
Systems risks are plentiful these days, and in a highly regulated industry, the challenges are tenfold.
In today’s fast-evolving technology landscape, being an engineering leader in compliance-heavy industries can be a struggle. Managing risks and ensuring data integrity are paramount, but the dangers are constant when working with large data sources and systems.
Traditional integration testing within the context of stringent regulatory requirements is more challenging to manage at scale. This leads to gaps, such as insufficient test coverage across interconnected systems, a lack of visibility into data flows, inadequate logging, and missed edge case conditions, particularly in third-party interactions. Due to these weaknesses, security vulnerabilities can pop up and incident response can be delayed, ultimately exposing organizations to violations and operational risk.
To stay ahead of the curve, organizations need to modernize integration testing strategies to ensure seamless interoperability.
Integration testing challenges
Highly interconnected and complex systems rely on multiple APIs, microservices, and external third-party services to exchange data in real time. As this was not the case in legacy software applications of old, new integration challenges are common.
Complex interdependencies
APIs and third-party services must work perfectly. In dense systems with various platforms, even a single failure point can trigger compliance issues and disrupt mission-critical activities, leading to application failure.
This means that:
- Real-time regulatory reporting systems must function seamlessly without any data discrepancies.
- Compliance-driven workflows must maintain accuracy across multiple systems.
- Auditability and traceability aspects must be embedded into systems so that they are able to support transparency and regulatory reviews.
- Security and data integrity must be maintained to prevent risks.
To add insult to injury, these large systems are handling massive transaction volumes within milliseconds. Using traditional models with batch processing just won’t cut it anymore, as there’s a need for testing strategies that detect inconsistencies in data, latency issues, or bottlenecks.
Data integrity, security, and fraud prevention
For fraudsters and cybercriminals, data is a primary target. Integration testing becomes a highly essential step. The encryption of data transmissions helps prevent on-path attackers. In addition, real-time fraud detection systems must remain resilient under scenarios where there is heavy load.
Cloud-native and distributed architectures
In a lot of RegTech industries, cloud natives are becoming the next big adoption wave. In situations where regulatory data is flowing across multiple cloud architectures, like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, we need to make sure that this has been addressed in the pre-release stages. We want to ensure fault tolerance in scenarios where communication between microservices falters. This could lead to cascading failures, latency, or data loss. Without proper error handling, a minor disruption has the potential to cause bigger issues, jeopardizing data integrity and compliance.
More like this
Strategies for robust integration testing
Taking advantage of all the modern testing approaches has never been more necessary. Here are a few options that could reap great rewards.
AI-driven test automation
There has been no shortage of AI mentioned in the mainstream, with many orgs pushing for new and innovative ways to adopt this tech into day-to-day processes.
AI-driven automation testing can take various forms depending on the tools’ maturity and complexity of the system under test. At a basic level, it includes automated test case generation using natural language models or machine learning algorithms that analyze past behavior and logs to suggest new test cases. It also involves predictive failure detection, where AI models analyze logs and system behavior over time to predict potential issues before they impact end users.
In more advanced cases, AI can also optimize regression test suites, prioritize tests, and remove redundant test cases based on code changes. AI can also be used for self-healing tests: an automation that updates itself when the UI or API changes, reducing manual work and ensuring tests run smoothly.
A caveat: it needs to be said that all adoption of AI should come with its own security warnings. AI-driven tools can introduce risks like model bias, explainability issues, and, in some cases, could also expose sensitive test data during training. If AI is not properly governed, it may make decisions that are difficult to audit and noncompliant with standards.
API contract testing
API contract testing is a modern approach used to validate the expectations between different systems, making sure that any changes in APIs don’t break expectations or contracts. Changes might include removing or renaming a field and altering data types or response structures. These seemingly small updates can cause downstream systems to crash or behave incorrectly if they are not properly communicated or validated ahead of time.
This has become highly critical in microservice ecosystems where a single undocumented change can snowball and cause widespread outages or inconsistent responses across systems.
Shifting left and right
Shifting left refers to the practice of performing testing activities earlier in the software development lifecycle. In the context of compliance, this means validating requirements and security policies, and auditing readiness as a part of development instead of doing it in the final QA phases. This ensures that teams can identify issues sooner, reducing expensive rework and accelerating release cycles.
The shifting left practice has a lesser-known cousin: shifting right. Shifting right focuses on post-deployment validation using concepts such as observability and real-time monitoring techniques. For example, a QA team could use canary deployments with real-time monitoring to release a new feature to a smaller set of users. The deployment can be rolled back instantly if the results deviate from expectations.
Shifting left/right can support both incident response as well as audit trails. When organizations monitor compliance in production, teams are quickly able to identify any data breaches and reduce exposure to such issues. This helps them continuously adhere to standards and regulations.
Digital twins for regulatory simulation
Digital twins are virtual replicas of any given system that allow teams to test edge scenarios and real-world conditions in safer and controlled environments.
In the context of industries that are compliance-heavy, digital twins allow teams to simulate regulatory events before they even happen in production. This can be audit triggers, exception handling, or required notification workflows.
A financial services firm, for example, could use digital twins to simulate a transaction that is not authentic and validate whether the system flags it correctly and regenerates the right logs and reports. This ensures that the live system is performing accurately before it is exposed to real-world risk.
Service virtualization for seamless testing
Similar to digital twins, using service virtualization allows teams to simulate or mock external systems or components that are unavailable or difficult to access during testing. It involves the creation of mock versions of APIs, services, or databases. Examples can include a payment gateway or an ID verification service that mimics a real system, returning realistic responses to test inputs. Since these data flows are realistic, they can improve API reliability.
In addition to that, integration testing becomes easier and faster with virtual services in sandbox environments; tests can run continuously without having to wait for dependent systems to be available. This allows faster feedback loops and improves regression coverage across dependent systems. In compliance-heavy industries, this is highly valuable because it enables data flows, logging, and error handling in conditions where real user data is not exposed.
Chaos engineering for safer systems
Chaos engineering is the process of intentionally introducing failures into a system to pinpoint weaknesses and gain a better understanding of system behavior before launching it to the world. In compliance-critical environments, this helps confirm if failover systems work with either automatic switchovers to backup systems or the rerouting of traffic during real-time failures.
Chaos engineering allows teams to simulate such scenarios and ensure that recovery processes meet compliance standards.
Enhanced collaboration between teams
In the evolving technology landscape, software quality is not just a technical concern. It is a business-critical function that can directly impact compliance and customer trust. That is why it is important to have strong collaboration between development, QA, security, and business teams. When these teams work in silos, it can result in fragmented testing and missed requirements leading to delays in deployments and poor quality products.
To foster better cross-functional collaboration, leaders can implement strategies such as:
- Embedding compliance and QA representatives within product or development teams to bring awareness and consideration to specific requirements during sprint planning.
- Staging workshops with relevant stakeholders to discuss potential risks, ensuring alignment on what must be validated before the product goes live.
- Creating shared dashboards helps development, QA, and security teams align by providing visibility into test coverage, defects, and deployment readiness metrics.
London • June 16 & 17, 2025
Speakers Gergely Orosz, Camille Fournier and Lara Hogan confirmed.
How engineering leaders can move forward
Staying ahead in integration testing is highly important for engineering leaders to ensure success.
Regulatory frameworks are evolving. It is vital for firms to adopt modern and creative integration testing strategies in a seamless fashion without compromising compliance or security.
