Berlin

November 4 & 5, 2024

New York

September 4 & 5, 2024

Why most technology migrations fail (and what we’ve learned along the way)

Jai Chakrabarti shares learnings (and misses) about how we were able to move molehills and, in some cases, mountains while preserving engineering velocity and a sense of ownership and autonomy.

Speakers: Jai Chakrabarti

Register or log in to access this video

Create an account to access our free engineering leadership content, free online events and to receive our weekly email newsletter. We will also keep you up to date with LeadDev events.

Register with google

We have linked your account and just need a few more details to complete your registration:

Terms and conditions

 

 

Enter your email address to reset your password.

 

A link has been emailed to you - check your inbox.



Don't have an account? Click here to register
January 21, 2022

Migrations- often seen as a necessary evil and bain of existence for engineers. Spotify is no exception to the laws (and pitfalls) of migrations that pay down debt and help advance tech strategy. While we share common problems with every other tech org, because of our scale and organizational structures and decisions, we have iterated on a set of principles and processes to ease the pain of transitioning from one tech stack – whether it be as low level as OS or language version – to higher level product features.

Spotify is a globally distributed company with 280+ engineering teams and 1200+ microservices. We’ve had a strong focus on engineering autonomy, and, as such, within our Platform (infrastructure) org, have had to cultivate ways to drive migrations with carrots over sticks. We’ve achieved this through a strong focus on product and product marketing techniques, quantitative insights, and driving a clear value proposition for engineers. We’ll share our learnings (and misses) about how we were able to move molehills and, in some cases, mountains while preserving engineering velocity and a sense of ownership and autonomy.